David Beisel's Perspective on Digital Change
David Beisel

Internet VC at NextView
Boston / Cambridge, MA
david at nextviewventures dot com
@davidbeisel

View David Beisel's profile on LinkedIn

Twitter
« VCs and Bipolarization: What Hasn’t Happened - Yet | Main | Bipolarization of Internet Acquisitions in 2005 »
Tuesday
Nov222005

Friction is Multiplicative

We’ve been meeting with (and investing in) a number of online and mobile consumer-facing services startups recently. A lot of our due diligence questions when exploring these potential investments surrounds customer usage – after all, you can’t have a successful consumer-facing startup without the consumers.

A key component (and risk-area) in most of these businesses is in generating a critical mass of users utilizing the service. One of the lessons that I’ve learned through my own experience with web-based consumer-facing services is the importance in reducing friction between and before desired actions. Any element of a service that would cause a user to either hesitate or initiate an extra step in the process before a desired action should have a solid reason why it’s incorporated. Of course, this rule manifests itself a product strategy level – is there a download to initiate, registration to complete, or new behavior to learn in order to use a service? But this guide also governs granular tactical decisions – how many inputs fields should be included or how is a page laid out?

While I was managing the marketing of our e-mail newsletters at About.com, it always surprised me how minor changes in UI could significantly affect our conversation rates. Taking it one step further, considerable changes in a user workflow had dramatic changes in adoption and usage. In this experience, I learned the lesson that friction is multiplicative. Barriers towards a desired consumer action aren’t additive; they’re compounding on top of each other. Conversation rates in a several step process multiply across the entire sequence as a whole.

Obviously, this message has tactical execution implications. But it also has strategic ones which we consider as investors. Friction points inherent in the service’s usage should be overcome with a compelling value-proposition. So I always ask, “Is it worth it?” And the failure to reduce obvious tactical friction-points in a service signals a lack of in-house expertise (and culture of understanding) about the subtleties of marketing to the consumer.

The goal, however, isn’t to eliminate all the friction. Just the unnecessary portion. Then we ask if what’s left can be overwhelmed with the value proposition to induce adoption.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (7)

Very well put.
November 22, 2005 | Unregistered CommenterGreg Gibson
Lot of thanks David for this advice.I will use it very soon for a new consumer-oriented website I plan to launch.
November 23, 2005 | Unregistered CommenterXavier Quilliet
came across you from fred wilson.

another way to articulate it - lower the barriers to entry. a poor UI is definitely a barrier to entry. heavyweight registration form is another. if you want to build an architecture of participation you need to lower the barriers to entry.

http://www.redmonk.com/sogrady/archives/000954.html





November 23, 2005 | Unregistered CommenterJames Governor
David,

Interesting e-commerce perspective. Your discussion about the impact of friction on a business process remined me of many of our own coporate training in connection with Six Sigma. We have utilized several statistical methods to measure & analyze business processes in order to reduce "waste" or, in your example, "friction." Also the conversion rate you discuss is similar to what we describe as Rolled Throughput Yield (RTY) where the the yield of individual process steps are multiplied together to identify challenges and create opportunities across each step.
November 23, 2005 | Unregistered CommenterScott Nathan
ahh, good to see another post from someone who gets it. I definitely agree with you. When designing Ugather's UI, we decided that the actions/features were defined clearly and boldly. From that point, one rule we stuck with: everything needs to be one click away at all times (posting, browsing, messages regarding posts,etc.). People have tons of choices when using sites, and if you can't let them see why yours is "the one" right away, then the game is lost. Something else, that I don't know is another post topic, or a part of this, but users must truly feel like the site is alive and constantly being used. A site that looks and feels like a ghosttown with no content, will stay that way. That all comes down to UI, layout, and some other initial things. Anyway, good read, and let me know when the next Boston meetup is. Just got back from mountain view last week... very exciting stuff happening. Have a good thanksgiving weekend.

-Jason L. Baptiste
November 25, 2005 | Unregistered CommenterJason Baptiste

I have buyed many products on line.Cool.I found some good sites,whose
pruducts have gained popularity among socialites and celebrities.From
these sites,several of my friends buyed products.The Website including.
ed
hardy ed
street fashion
christian audigier
Ed Hardy Jeans
ed hardy online
ed hardy shirt
ed hardy shirts
Ed Hardy Shoes
Ed Hardy Sunglasses
Ed Hardy Tops
Ed Hardy Hoodies
Ed Hardy Swimwear
Ed Hardy Bags
Ed Hardy Caps
Ed Hardy Belts

September 2, 2010 | Unregistered Commenterkjiji

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>