GenuineVC David Beisel's Perspective on Digital Change

June 20, 2007

From appearances, one of the most difficult decisions that a set of founders make about their early stage company is what to call the company and/or first product (often one in the same). The name game appears to be so difficult because, at the end of the day, the rationale for each choice is largely subjective. For this reason, the process often becomes one that antagonizes the company for too long. But it shouldn’t be that way.

It is one thing to have a couple people involved generating and filtering options, and then it’s whole other when too many other constituents (investors, advisors, employees, marketing vendors) are sharing (read: strongly lobbying for) their disparate opinions as well. The last situation you want is a board meeting with bunch of VCs brainstorming name ideas. Ugh. (The only thing worse is asking that group for their thoughts on how the logo should look and what colors to use.) The situation is only exasperated by the limitations of .com domain names available these days or the willingness of everyone to pay up for one that’s parked.

In thinking about this post, I tried to come up with a solid list of go-to rules of thumb to guide in this exercise (e.g. “the name should describe/evoke what the company does,” “it should have five letters or less for simplicity sake,” “there should no mistake on how the name is pronounced”, etc., etc.). But then I realized not only are these rules broken occasionally, they’re broken often… and very successfully. I think the only rule that matters in a naming process is that founder(s) should listen to all advice but then absolutely trust their own gut as to what runs parallel to their vision. And then everyone should quickly move on. The hurt feelings will fade over time, and if the decision turns out to be the wrong one, it can always be changes later (with costs, of course).

About Me

  • avatar
  • I am a cofounder and Partner at NextView Ventures, a dedicated seed-stage venture capital firm making investments in internet-enabled startups. Read More »

Coordinates

Subscribe

Rob Cho Go




 RobGo.org

Lee Hower




 AgileVC

NextView Twitter Stream

51015
  • Rob Go
     - 19 hours ago
    RT @angusdav: Proud of @Swipely team achieving 120% of our new customer sales goal in June, while existing customers scored our NPS +65!
  • Rob Go
     - 19 hours ago
    @Spotify I am trying to cancel my subscriptio, but the cancel button disappeared. Hmmm… interesting timing
  • Rob Go
     - 23 hours ago
    @ManuKumar re: $2m seeds - both mismatched expectations and probably not good for their companies if premature
  • Rob Go
     - 23 hours ago
    @ManuKumar totally. Your post was really clear. And we can't really get away from how the industry communicates

Search